Key Takeaways
- FIFO reflects current costs on your balance sheet but can inflate profits during periods of rising material costs
- LIFO reduces taxable income when costs are rising but requires meticulous record-keeping and isn’t allowed internationally
- Weighted Average Cost smooths price fluctuations, making it ideal for manufacturers with homogeneous raw materials
- Your inventory valuation method directly affects gross margin calculations and financial covenant compliance with lenders
- Switching methods requires IRS approval and restatement, so choose carefully based on your manufacturing model and long-term strategy
Your raw material costs jumped 15% last quarter. Finished goods sitting in your warehouse were manufactured when steel cost 30% less than today’s prices. Labor rates increased. Energy costs fluctuated. Now you’re trying to figure out what your inventory is actually worth on your balance sheet, and the method you choose will determine whether you’re showing healthy profits or barely breaking even.
Welcome to inventory valuation for manufacturers, where your accounting method choice affects everything from tax liability to bank covenant compliance to whether potential buyers see a profitable operation or a struggling one.
Why Inventory Valuation Matters More for Manufacturers
Retailers buy finished products and sell them. Their inventory valuation is relatively straightforward—they’re valuing purchased goods. Manufacturers face complexity at every stage: raw materials purchased at varying prices, work-in-process with embedded labor and overhead costs, and finished goods that reflect production costs from weeks or months earlier.
Your inventory valuation method determines cost of goods sold (COGS), which directly affects gross margin—the metric lenders, investors, and potential acquirers scrutinize most closely. Choose FIFO during an inflationary period, and you’ll show higher profits but face higher taxes. Choose LIFO, and you’ll reduce tax liability but show lower inventory values that might affect borrowing capacity.
The method also affects how you track production costs. Manufacturing requires allocating direct materials, direct labor, and overhead to products. Your inventory valuation method influences when those costs hit your income statement versus remaining capitalized on your balance sheet.
FIFO: Matching Physical Flow But Inflating Profits
First-In, First-Out assumes you use your oldest raw materials first and sell your oldest finished goods first. For many manufacturers, this mirrors actual physical flow—you don’t want steel sitting in the back of the warehouse while you use newly delivered materials.
FIFO shows current costs in your ending inventory value. If you’re buying materials at today’s higher prices, your balance sheet reflects those recent costs. This makes your inventory appear more valuable, which can improve financial ratios and borrowing capacity.
The problem: FIFO assigns older, lower costs to your cost of goods sold. When material costs rise, your COGS reflects cheaper historical costs while revenue reflects current prices. This inflates your gross margin and increases taxable income. You’re paying taxes on “paper profits” created by the accounting method rather than true economic gains.
For manufacturers with long production cycles, FIFO can create significant timing mismatches. Raw materials purchased six months ago at lower costs get expensed against products sold today at current prices, creating artificially high margins that don’t reflect your current cost structure.
LIFO: Tax Benefits With Operational Headaches
Last-In, First-Out assumes you use the materials you purchased most recently first. This assigns current costs to COGS, providing a better match between current revenue and current expenses. When costs rise, LIFO reduces your taxable income by expensing higher recent costs against current sales.
The tax savings can be substantial. During inflationary periods, LIFO can reduce your tax liability significantly compared to FIFO. For manufacturers facing rising material and labor costs, this cash flow benefit justifies the additional complexity.
The complexity is real. LIFO requires detailed record-keeping to track inventory layers—the specific costs of materials purchased at different times. You need systems that can manage these layers accurately, or you risk LIFO liquidations that expense old, low-cost inventory, creating unexpected taxable income spikes.
LIFO also results in lower inventory values on your balance sheet, showing older, lower-cost costs for ending inventory. This reduces your working capital and might affect financial covenants or credit availability. Lenders sometimes adjust LIFO financial statements to estimate what results would look like under FIFO, adding another layer of explanation required during financial reviews.
LIFO isn’t permitted under IFRS. If you’re a U.S. manufacturer with international subsidiaries or considering expansion, maintaining separate inventory methods across entities can create consolidation challenges.
Weighted Average Cost: Stability for Commodity Materials
Weighted Average Cost calculates a running average cost for inventory. Each time you purchase raw materials, the new costs blend into your existing average. When you use materials or sell finished goods, you expense them at the current average cost.
This method smooths out price fluctuations, providing stability in your gross margin calculations. Manufacturers dealing with commodity materials—steel, aluminum, plastics, chemicals—benefit from this approach because volatile spot prices don’t create wild swings in reported profitability.
The calculation is straightforward: the total cost of inventory divided by the total units equals the average cost per unit. When you purchase materials, recalculate the average. When you use materials or sell products, expense at the current average cost. Most modern manufacturing accounting systems handle this automatically.
Weighted Average Cost works particularly well for manufacturers with continuous production processes where materials commingle. If you’re melting down scrap metal with new materials or blending chemical batches, physical tracking of specific purchase lots becomes impractical. Average costing reflects the operational reality.
The method doesn’t provide the tax benefits of LIFO during inflation, nor does it show current costs in inventory like FIFO. But for manufacturers prioritizing consistent financial reporting and operational simplicity, the middle-ground approach often makes the most sense.
Specific Identification: For Custom Manufacturing
Some manufacturers produce unique, high-value products—aerospace components, custom machinery, specialized equipment. When each product is distinct and costs can be tracked to specific jobs, Specific Identification provides precise inventory valuation.
This method tracks actual costs for each specific item from raw materials through production to completion. Job costing systems support this approach, accumulating direct materials, direct labor, and allocated overhead for each job or production order.
Precision comes at an administrative cost. You need systems that can track costs at the individual job or product level, maintain those cost records through production and storage, and correctly match specific costs to specific sales when products ship.
For manufacturers with government contracts, Specific Identification might be required to comply with Federal Acquisition Regulations. The method provides the detailed cost documentation that government auditors expect, supporting overhead rate calculations and contract billing.
Making the Right Choice for Your Manufacturing Operation
Your optimal inventory valuation method depends on your production process, cost structure, financial goals, and reporting requirements.
Consider FIFO if you have stable material costs, want to maximize balance sheet inventory values for lending purposes, or operate internationally, where IFRS reporting applies and LIFO isn’t permitted. The method is straightforward and aligns with physical inventory flow for most manufacturers.
Choose LIFO if you face rising material and labor costs, want to minimize current tax liability, and have the systems to manage layer complexity. The tax savings can provide significant cash flow benefits, but ensure your accounting systems can handle the requirements.
Opt for Weighted Average Cost if you manufacture with commodity materials that fluctuate in price, want consistent gross margin reporting, or have continuous production processes where specific lot tracking is impractical.
Use Specific Identification if you manufacture custom products, have government contracts requiring detailed cost tracking, or produce high-value items where precise cost allocation justifies the administrative effort.
Getting Expert Guidance on Inventory Accounting
Manufacturing inventory valuation involves judgment calls that affect your financial statements, tax position, and stakeholder relationships. The “right” method depends on your specific operational and financial circumstances.
Wiss works with manufacturers and engineering firms across diverse industries, providing guidance on inventory accounting methods, cost allocation strategies, and financial reporting optimization. We understand both the technical accounting requirements and the operational realities of manufacturing businesses.
Whether you’re establishing inventory methods for a new manufacturing operation, considering a change in methods, or optimizing your current approach, we can help you evaluate options and implement solutions that support your business objectives.
Need guidance on inventory valuation methods for your manufacturing operation? Contact Wiss to discuss how our manufacturing accounting expertise can help you choose and implement the right approach for your business.
Previous
Share
